AI Comparison
Multi-LLM Solution

Do you trust just one AI?

Compare multiple AI responses simultaneously and select the most accurate result.

🤖
4-6 AIs Simultaneously
📊
Real-time Comparison
Hallucination Check
🔒
On-Premise

Sound familiar?

Common problems when using AI for work.

🤥

AI confidently gave wrong answers

Have you ever trusted ChatGPT's confident-sounding but incorrect information and used it in your work?

🔀

Different AIs give different answers

Same question, but ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude give different answers. No criteria for choosing.

⚠️

Relying on a single AI for important decisions

Reports, contract reviews, translations - relying on one AI's judgment is risky.

🎲

Employees use different AIs

Some use ChatGPT, others Gemini. Output quality is inconsistent with no unified standard.

👻

No AI usage records

No records of who asked what and what AI answered. Management and auditing are impossible.

🔍

No way to verify AI answers

To judge if AI's answer is correct, humans must manually verify. Double the time.

How It Works

One question, multiple AI responses compared side by side.

1

Ask a Question

Type your question as usual. Just once.

2

AI Responds Simultaneously

4-6 AIs respond at the same time, each from their own perspective.

3

Compare & Select

Compare responses side by side and select the most accurate result.

Why compare multiple AIs?

Overcome single AI limitations through cross-verification.

🛡️

Prevent Hallucination

Even if one AI gives wrong information, comparing with other AIs reveals it immediately.

⚖️

Remove AI Bias

Each AI has different training data. Combining multiple AI answers yields balanced results.

🏆

Select the Best Answer

Different AIs excel at different tasks. A may be better at translation, B at summarization, C at analysis.

📊

Evidence for Decisions

"3 out of 4 AIs reached the same conclusion" - number-backed evidence makes reporting easier.

Effective for these industries

Where AI is used but accuracy verification is needed

💻

IT / Software

Hidden security vulnerabilities in AI code

Code review comparison, technical docs, architecture validation, security analysis

⚖️

Law Firms / Patent Offices

AI cites non-existent cases

Case analysis comparison, contract review, legal cross-verification

🏥

Healthcare / Pharma

AI generates inaccurate medical info

Medical literature summary, clinical data interpretation, drug interaction review

💰

Finance / Insurance

AI includes unsubstantiated figures

Market analysis comparison, risk assessment, regulatory interpretation

📢

Marketing / Advertising

AI copies all look the same

Copy comparison, market analysis, target strategy, competitor research

🔬

Research / R&D

AI cites papers that don't exist

Paper summary comparison, data interpretation, literature review

🎓

Education

AI-made questions have wrong answers

Exam question generation, textbook review, study material comparison

🧾

Accounting / Tax

AI answers based on outdated tax law

Tax law interpretation, tax strategy review, financial analysis

🚢

Trade / Logistics

AI-provided tariff rates are wrong

HS code classification, customs regulations, FTA origin determination

📈

Consulting

AI report submitted directly to client

Industry analysis, feasibility review, competitive analysis

🏭

Manufacturing / QC

Terminology errors in AI-translated docs

ISO documentation, SOP review, technical spec translation

📺

Media / Content

AI articles contain factual errors

Fact-checking, script comparison, subtitle translation review

📚

Publishing / Translation

Mistranslation from using AI directly

Manuscript proofreading, translation quality check, fact-checking

🏗️

Real Estate / Construction

AI provides outdated building codes

Contract review, regulation comparison, permit requirements

👥

HR / Recruitment

AI job descriptions contain bias

Job description comparison, interview questions, labor law review

🏢

General Business

AI report submitted as-is got flagged

Report drafts, proposals, announcements, translation verification

For Management

Admin Dashboard

Executives and admins can monitor all employees' AI usage at a glance.

admin.company.com/ai-dashboard
오늘 총 질의
1,247
+12% vs 어제
활성 사용자
38 / 52
73% 활용률
합의 일치율
87%
환각 차단 52건
이번 달 비용
₩840K
예산 대비 67%
최근 세션 로그
프로젝트: 전체 부서: 전체
김편집 편집부 2026 봄 신간
원고 교정 — 3장 맞춤법 검토
AI 3개 · 일치 3/3
2분 전
이마케팅 마케팅 마케팅 Q2
SNS 카피 비교 — 봄 캠페인
AI 4개 · 일치 2/4
8분 전
박기획 기획실 전략기획
경쟁사 동향 분석 리포트
AI 3개 · 일치 3/3
15분 전
최번역 해외사업 해외 라이선스
계약서 영문 번역 검수
AI 4개 · 일치 4/4
23분 전
👥

Per-Employee Usage

See who used which AI, when, in real-time. Compare usage by department and team.

🔍

Work History & Search

All questions and AI responses are automatically saved. Search past work by keyword and share best practices.

📂

Per-Project Session View

Browse AI session logs organized by project. Track how much AI contributed to each project.

📊

Usage Reports & Cost Analysis

Monthly AI usage, response times, and cost trends in reports. Ready for executive briefings.

🔒

Security & Audit Logs

Sensitive data detection, abnormal usage alerts, and audit trail logs. Compliant with internal security policies.

🛡️

Role-Based Access Control

Executives see everything, team leads see their team, employees see only their own records.

Available Formats

Choose the tool that fits your work environment.

Multi-AI Orchestrator
"이 코드의 보안 취약점을 분석해 주세요"
전송
Claude MAIN
2.3s

SQL Injection 위험이 있습니다.

Line 42의 query() 호출에서 사용자 입력이 직접 삽입됩니다.

Prepared Statement로 변경을 권장합니다.

$stmt = prepare("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?");

심각도: Critical

GPT
3.1s

주요 취약점 3건 발견:

1. SQL Injection — L42 파라미터 바인딩 누락

2. XSS — L67 출력 이스케이프 없음

3. CSRF — POST 핸들러에 토큰 검증 없음

// 추가 권장:
htmlspecialchars($output)
Gemini
2.8s

OWASP Top 10 기준 분석:

A03:2021 Injection — query() 취약

A07:2021 XSS — 미이스케이프 출력

A01:2021 Access Control — 양호

위험도 점수: 8.5/10

3개 AI 공통: SQL Injection 최우선 수정

1
개별 응답
2
크로스 쉐어
3
종합 결론
🔄 크로스 쉐어 실행 AI들이 서로의 답변을 검토하고 보완합니다
🔄 AI 상호 토론 (Cross-Share) Round 2
Claude GPT 의 CSRF 지적에 동의합니다.

제 초기 분석에서 CSRF를 누락했습니다. POST /api/update 엔드포인트에 csrf_token 검증이 필요합니다.

GPT Gemini 의 OWASP 점수 산정에 보충합니다.

CSRF까지 포함하면 위험도는 8.5 → 9.1로 상향 조정이 적절합니다.

Gemini Claude 의 Prepared Statement 방식에 동의하며 추가 제안합니다.

PDO 사용 시 ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES = false 설정도 함께 적용하세요.

✓ 토론 후 합의

취약점 4건 확정 (SQL Injection, XSS, CSRF, Emulate Prepares) · 위험도 9.1/10 · 최우선: SQL Injection + CSRF 동시 수정

3개 AI · 개별 응답 2.7초 + 상호 토론 4.1초 토론 후 보완: 4건 (초기 대비 +1건 발견)

Compare AI responses side by side in an intuitive interface. Click to operate, install and use immediately.

Panel Comparison Click Operation Instant Setup All OS Support
claude — ~/project
user> 이 함수의 시간복잡도를 분석하고 최적화 방법을 제안해 주세요
Multi-AI 합의 (4개 AI 병렬 질의 · 3.2초)
GPT: O(n²) — 중첩 루프. HashMap으로 O(n) 가능
Gemini: O(n²) — 정렬 후 투포인터로 O(n log n) 가능
Kilo: O(n²) — Set 활용 시 O(n), 메모리 트레이드오프 고려
Codex: O(n²) — HashMap 추천. 캐시 지역성도 개선됨
✓ 합의: 4/4 일치 — 현재 O(n²), HashMap으로 O(n) 최적화 가능
Claude (종합):

4개 AI 모두 현재 시간복잡도를 O(n²)로 분석했습니다.

최적화 방법에 대해서는 두 가지 접근이 제시되었습니다:

1. HashMap/Set — O(n), 추가 메모리 O(n) (GPT, Kilo, Codex 추천)
2. 정렬+투포인터 — O(n log n), 추가 메모리 O(1) (Gemini 추천)

데이터 크기가 크고 메모리 여유가 있다면 HashMap 방식을 추천합니다.

// Before: O(n²)
for (i) for (j) if (arr[i]+arr[j] == target)

// After: O(n)
const map = new Map();
for (const num of arr) {'{'}
  if (map.has(target - num)) return true;
  map.set(num, true);
{'}'}
user>

Query and receive results quickly in the terminal. Integrates with automation scripts for repetitive tasks.

Terminal-based Automation Ready Batch Processing Script Integration

Service Plans

From installation to training and maintenance, all in one.

🏗️

Initial Setup

별도 협의
  • Environment analysis & installation
  • AI service integration
  • Department prompt templates
  • Admin training (2 sessions)
CORE
🔄

Monthly Maintenance

From ₩1M/월
  • AI service monitoring
  • Usage reports (monthly)
  • AI model update support
  • Prompt optimization support
  • Usage Q&A support
🎓

Staff Training

포함
  • Admin training (operations)
  • Department lead training
  • User guide documentation
  • Additional training by request

Start using AI systematically

Don't rely on one AI - build a system to compare multiple AIs

Get Consultation